<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>haslo.ch - Guido's Blog &#187; spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.haslo.ch/blog/tag/spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.haslo.ch/blog</link>
	<description>We believe that people with passion can change the world for the better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:23:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Commenting Policy?</title>
		<link>http://www.haslo.ch/blog/new-commenting-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.haslo.ch/blog/new-commenting-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>haslo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[haslo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.haslo.ch/blog/?p=2840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the recent weeks, I have gotten quite a bit of not-quite-but-nearly-totally-spam-that-duisguises-really-well. As a result, I removed my DoFollow plugin. But I don&#8217;t really like that solution. I think I might change my approach and make a new commenting policy rule. A quite simple one at that: Every comment that uses some kind of product [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the recent weeks, I have gotten quite a bit of not-quite-but-nearly-totally-spam-that-duisguises-really-well. As a result, I removed my <a href="http://kimmo.suominen.com/sw/dofollow/">DoFollow plugin</a>.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t really like that solution.</p>
<p>I think I might change my approach and make a new commenting policy rule. A quite simple one at that: <strong>Every comment that uses some kind of product name as their &#8220;name&#8221; will be deleted</strong> (also those who were made before today), no questions asked, and I re-establish the DoFollow plugin.</p>
<p>I can always delete the links that lead to sites I don&#8217;t want to support afterwards, although I&#8217;d of course need to introduce an explicit disclaimer for that as well. (Luckily, my current disclaimer reads &#8220;I reserve the right to delete spam as I see fit, even if it’s handcrafted&#8221;, so I won&#8217;t break any promises if I delete things that are spammier than I like retroactively).</p>
<p>On the other hand, I really love your contributions, and I really don&#8217;t want to make contributing with comments harder than it apparently already is&#8230;</p>
<p>What do you think? How do you handle that kind of thing in your own blog(s)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.haslo.ch/blog/new-commenting-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

